Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Echocardiography ; 39(9): 1198-1208, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968089

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) is a validated index of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling with prognostic value. We determined the predictive value of TAPSE/PASP ratio and adverse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-nine consecutive hospitalized racially/ethnically diverse adults (≥18 years of age) admitted with COVID-19 between March and June 2020 with clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) that included adequate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocities for calculation of PASP were studied. The exposure of interest was impaired RV-PA coupling as assessed by TAPSE/PASP ratio. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints comprised of ICU admission, incident acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and systolic heart failure. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six patients had both technically adequate TAPSE measurements and measurable TR velocities for analysis. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, race/ethnicity, diabetes mellitus, and smoking status, log(TAPSE/PASP) had a significantly inverse association with ICU admission (p = 0.015) and death (p = 0.038). ROC analysis showed the optimal cutoff for TAPSE/PASP for death was 0.51 mm mmHg-1 (AUC = 0.68). Unsupervised machine learning identified two groups of echocardiographic function. Of all echocardiographic measures included, TAPSE/PASP ratio was the most significant in predicting in-hospital mortality, further supporting its significance in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Impaired RV-PA coupling, assessed noninvasively via the TAPSE/PASP ratio, was predictive of need for ICU level care and in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 suggesting utility of TAPSE/PASP in identification of poor clinical outcomes in this population both by traditional statistical and unsupervised machine learning based methods.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right , Adult , Cyclophosphamide/analogs & derivatives , Echocardiography, Doppler , Humans , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Unsupervised Machine Learning , Ventricular Function, Right
2.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 866146, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1933624

ABSTRACT

Background: The relationship between inflammation and corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation is currently not well defined in patients with COVID-19. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of marked interval changes in the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) on QTc interval in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adult patients admitted with COVID-19 infection, we identified 85 patients who had markedly elevated CRP levels and serial measurements of an ECG and CRP during the same admission. We compared mean QTc interval duration, and other clinical and ECG characteristics between times when CRP values were high and low. We performed mixed-effects linear regression analysis to identify associations between CRP levels and QTc interval in univariable and adjusted models. Results: Mean age was 58 ± 16 years, of which 39% were women, 41% were Black, and 25% were White. On average, the QTc interval calculated via the Bazett formula was 15 ms higher when the CRP values were "high" vs. "low" [447 ms (IQR 427-472 ms) and 432 ms (IQR 412-452 ms), respectively]. A 100 mg/L increase in CRP was associated with a 1.5 ms increase in QTc interval [ß coefficient 0.15, 95% CI (0.06-0.24). In a fully adjusted model for sociodemographic, ECG, and clinical factors, the association remained significant (ß coefficient 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.23). Conclusion: An interval QTc interval prolongation is observed with a marked elevation in CRP levels in patients with COVID-19.

3.
Circulation ; 143(6): 553-565, 2021 02 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1199832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge gaps remain in the epidemiology and clinical implications of myocardial injury in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the prevalence and outcomes of myocardial injury in severe COVID-19 compared with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) unrelated to COVID-19. METHODS: We included intubated patients with COVID-19 from 5 hospitals between March 15 and June 11, 2020, with troponin levels assessed. We compared them with patients from a cohort study of myocardial injury in ARDS and performed survival analysis with primary outcome of in-hospital death associated with myocardial injury. In addition, we performed linear regression to identify clinical factors associated with myocardial injury in COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 243 intubated patients with COVID-19, 51% had troponin levels above the upper limit of normal. Chronic kidney disease, lactate, ferritin, and fibrinogen were associated with myocardial injury. Mortality was 22.7% among patients with COVID-19 with troponin under the upper limit of normal and 61.5% for those with troponin levels >10 times the upper limit of normal (P<0.001). The association of myocardial injury with mortality was not statistically significant after adjusting for age, sex, and multisystem organ dysfunction. Compared with patients with ARDS without COVID-19, patients with COVID-19 were older and had higher creatinine levels and less favorable vital signs. After adjustment, COVID-19-related ARDS was associated with lower odds of myocardial injury compared with non-COVID-19-related ARDS (odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.84]; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial injury in severe COVID-19 is a function of baseline comorbidities, advanced age, and multisystem organ dysfunction, similar to traditional ARDS. The adverse prognosis of myocardial injury in COVID-19 relates largely to multisystem organ involvement and critical illness.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Injuries , Myocardium/metabolism , Registries , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Aged , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Heart Injuries/blood , Heart Injuries/etiology , Heart Injuries/mortality , Heart Injuries/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/blood , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/complications , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/mortality , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate , Troponin
4.
Crit Care Explor ; 2(10): e0227, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-873082

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of elevated right and left heart filling pressures in coronavirus disease 2019 is not well characterized. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension and concurrent elevated left heart filling pressure in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. We hypothesized that a significant proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 patients has evidence of pulmonary hypertension associated with elevated left heart filling pressure on transthoracic echocardiography. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: Hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients who underwent clinical transthoracic echocardiography. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The exposure variable of interest was right ventricular systolic pressure, calculated using the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Pulmonary hypertension was defined as right ventricular systolic pressure greater than 40 mm Hg. Left heart filling pressure was estimated with Nagueh's method for pulmonary artery occlusion pressure using E/e' ratio, and normal was considered pulmonary artery occlusion pressure less than 16 mm Hg. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between the patients with and without pulmonary hypertension. A total of 73 patients (median age 66 yr [57-75 yr]; 46% women) were included. Median right ventricular systolic pressure was 39 mm Hg (interquartile range, 32-50 mm Hg), and 36 patients (49.3%) had evidence of pulmonary hypertension. Patients with pulmonary hypertension were more likely to require ICU admission (86% vs 65%; p = 0.035) and have acute respiratory distress syndrome (72% vs 49%; p = 0.0053) than those without. In-hospital mortality was 26% for those with pulmonary hypertension compared with 14% for those without (p = 0.19). Patients with pulmonary hypertension had higher median-estimated pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (17.4 mm Hg [12.7-21.3 mm Hg] vs 12.1 mm Hg [10.0-14.1 mm Hg]; p = 0.0008), and elevated left heart filling pressure was present in 59% of those with pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary hypertension is common in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Left ventricular filling pressure is elevated in over half of those with pulmonary hypertension and may represent a target to reduce right ventricular afterload and potentially improve outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019.

5.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 76(1): 72-84, 2020 07 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-617527

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a major unanticipated stress on the workforce, organizational structure, systems of care, and critical resource supplies. To ensure provider safety, to maximize efficiency, and to optimize patient outcomes, health systems need to be agile. Critical care cardiologists may be uniquely positioned to treat the numerous respiratory and cardiovascular complications of the SARS-CoV-2 and support clinicians without critical care training who may be suddenly asked to care for critically ill patients. This review draws upon the experiences of colleagues from heavily impacted regions of the United States and Europe, as well as lessons learned from military mass casualty medicine. This review offers pragmatic suggestions on how to implement scalable models for critical care delivery, cultivate educational tools for team training, and embrace technologies (e.g., telemedicine) to enable effective collaboration despite social distancing imperatives.


Subject(s)
Cardiology Service, Hospital , Coronavirus Infections , Critical Care , Delivery of Health Care , Organizational Innovation , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Cardiology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Cardiology Service, Hospital/trends , Civil Defense/methods , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Care/trends , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Humans , Organizational Objectives , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL